Review: 'This is Life' by Dan Rhodes

Dan Rhodes books make me happy. They are full of quirky people falling in love with other quirky people in unlikely, serendipitous circumstances. There's a gentleness and a direct soft humour to his stories, usually with a hint of melancholy. I find I have to make certain allowances if I'm to enjoy them; the writing style is simple and mundane, and some people might find the world of Dan Rhodes a little saccharine and sentimental and unlikely, but by the end of his books, I always feel warmly satisfied. 

I read 'This is LIfe', expecting a light jaunty read and that's what I got. The main character is Aurélie, an art student studying in Paris. For an art project she throws a stone in the air in a busy street and it lands on a baby in a pram. The mother of this baby is furious and in a moment of strange revenge, insists that Aurélie must look after the baby for a week. The book covers the duration of this week, in which Aurélie comes across various interesting people including the Akiyamas, a Japanese couple on holiday being shown around Paris by Aurélie's best friend, Sylvie, and a world-famous performance artist, known as 'Le Machine'. Le Machine is in Paris performing a show called 'Life' in which he lives naked on a stage for 12 weeks and displays everything his body produces during that time in glass jars.

The portrayal of the pretentious artist seems to begin as a parody but ends as something with real meaning. Dan Rhodes wants you to see the beauty in life. This book is an elaborate construction with that design in mind; all the frivolous characters and their unlikely adventures are really impelled forward purely by this drive to exhibit a manifestation of the true meaning of life. This is, after all, what novels do best, because you can show life in all its slow-motion details, then leave the reader at the end with an appreciation of the whole, all those words, all those details, closed and concluded: a rounded message for what it's worth, a facsimile of death.

(More on this book at Pixelled Wheels Clunk Up Hills.)

Review: 'The Luzhin Defense' by Vladimir Nabokov

Reading a Nabokov novel is like trying to solve a puzzle. Reading any novel is like trying to solve a puzzle to a certain extent: one must try to untangle the different layers of meaning, some unintentional, some so intentional they examine themselves, some so seemingly meaningless they become profound. Who is this omniscient narrator? How much of this is autobiographical? What's the message here? In a Nabokov novel, you assume the narrator to be omniscient, because that's what you're used to, but then you realise that this narrator is fallible and misunderstands the story he/she is trying tell, has ignored a detail that will become significant later on.

I must admit at this point that 'The Luzhin Defense' (spelling is Americanised as such on my copy) is only the third Nabokov novel I have read, the other two being 'Lolita' and 'Pale Fire', and I base all the above generalisations on these books. Perhaps, this being an earlier work, I thought, there might not be this kind of cryptic playfulness, and though there certainly isn't the same kind of fallible active narrator, there is still the hint of a wry smile to the storytelling, a hidden logic that only becomes clear at the end.

The book is about chess. A chess prodigy, Luzhin, has a nervous breakdown brought on by the mental strain of playing a tournament against his rival, the Italian, Tureti. His wife attempts to nurse him back to health by removing every trace of the game from his life, but it's an impossible task. 

Chess is ripe for metaphor. Many a sport has been described as resembling a game of chess at one time or another. Chess is the paradigm of abstract game strategy and logical thinking. Life is like chess, in its goal-directedness, its strict rules, its patterns, its limitations, its frustrating logical deadends. And this is what Nabokov is suggesting; or rather this is what Luzhin comes to believe in the story. The feeling that life is like chess overwhelms him. He sees chess in everything, in the interplay of shadows on the parlour floor, in the diagonal between two opposing urns on pedestals, in a telegraph pole a knight's move away from a lime tree. He cannot tell metaphor from reality anymore. 

Our lives are quests for meaning, attempts to work out the answers to the eternal questions. What would happen if we began to see those quests as games, similar to chess? What happens when we know there's no way we can win?